SPONSOR ADS

  HOMEPAGE | ARTICLES

 

 

DIRECTORY CATEGORIES

Attorney Legal Services
Boston Legal
Boston Legal Abc
Continuing Legal Education
Debt Settlement Legal
Free Legal Aid
Free Legal Contract
Free Legal Document
Free Legal Form
Free Legal Form Download
Free Legal Form Online
Free Legal Wills
Free Online Legal Advice
Gay Marriage Legal
Home School Legal Defense

ARTICLES INDEX

1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6

 

SPONSOR ADS

SPONSOR ADS

The Death Penalty Debate

By Peter Kennedy

While the death penalty has been utilized for centuries, we continue to debate the morality and efficacy of this punishment. Many people argue that the death penalty acts as a deterrent to potential murderers, terrorists, and other violent criminals. However, others find the death penalty completely incompatible with the ethical standards of modern civilization. Although some states have since outlawed the practice, the US remains one of few democracies to maintain the capital punishment.

The term “capital punishment” originates from the Latin word “caput,” which means head. Capital punishment, therefore, was a punishment reserved for serious crimes that warranted decapitation. Such serious crimes, referred to as capital offenses, are generally limited to treason and murder in the U.S. However, in different legal systems of foreign countries, the death penalty may be given for a lesser crime, like robbery. The most common modern methods of execution are electrocution and lethal injection. These methods are seen as more humane than previous methods, which included use of a firing squad, burning at the stake, crucifixion, decapitation, hanging and gassing.

Even with these more “humane” treatments, many people have trouble justifying the taking of human life – no matter how heinous the crime. The death penalty, opponents argue, is immoral. They ask, “How can the government condemn killing by killing?” To these critics, the death penalty is the ultimate betrayal of human rights and it has no place in our society. Furthermore, they argue, criminal proceedings are fraught with human error, causing innocent people to be executed. Finally, opponents of the death penalty argue that capital punishment is not an effective criminal deterrent.

Unlike the critics, strong supporters of the death penalty assert that capital punishment deters violent crime. In addition to the question of deterrence, supporters of capital punishment argue that such retribution is morally justified. In many cases, especially involving murder and terrorism, execution is the best remedy, because it will guarantee that a monstrous person will be incapable of harming society. Finally, from an economic standpoint, executing a criminal will be less expensive than the seemingly limitless access to appeals in the U.S. courts.

The death penalty debate calls into the question the role and boundaries of the justice process. Should the government have the right to kill? Is the death penalty morally justifiable?

About the author:
OpineTree is a blog website that encourages debate on today’s most controversial political topics, including abortion, affirmative action, cloning, the death penalty, euthanasia, gay marriage, gun control, health care, social security, stem cells, as well as other debate topics. Visit http://www.opinetree.com/deathpenalty.htmlto join the death penalty debate.


Circulated by Article Emporium




 




  Copyright Horizonweb.com 2005-2006. All Rights Reserved.

Legal OR Lawyer OR Justice OR Attorney OR Lawsuit - Google News

By Revealing Man's Past, Lawyer Tests Court Secrecy
New York Times
In May 2010, a civil racketeering lawsuit was filed accusing a group of people associated with a New York investment firm of stealing millions of dollars from investors. The allegation was almost commonplace; the response was anything but.

and more »


Comics: Justice League fights real-world hunger
The Seattle Times
Batman, Superman, Wonder Woman and the rest of the Justice League will be used to raise awareness, not to mention millions of dollars. Both of which are needful. According to DC, the Horn countries are suffering their worst drought in more than 60 ...

and more »


USA TODAY

Judge allows 'Sister Wives' suit to proceed
The Associated Press
SALT LAKE CITY (AP) — A federal judge has ruled there's sufficient evidence to allow a polygamous family made famous by a reality TV show to pursue a lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of Utah's bigamy law. US District Judge Clark Waddoups on ...
Federal judge allows polygamous family's lawsuit challenging Utah's bigamy law ...Washington Post
Judge won't dismiss 'Sister Wives' lawsuitSalt Lake Tribune

all 183 news articles »


Teacher arrests show 'complete failure' at LA school, attorney says
Los Angeles Times
Accusations by a student at Miramonte Elementary School that she was a victim of two teachers accused of abuse raises troubling questions about oversight at the school, the attorney for her family said. “Based on my experience, it appears to show a ...

and more »


USA TODAY

Rosa Parks estate legal agreement revealed
USA TODAY
By Melanie Eversley, USA TODAY A secret legal agreement to settle the squabbles over the estate of civil rights grand dame Rosa Parks has been made public by the Detroit Free Press. The news organization reports that the seven-page confidential ...
The secrets are out on deal to settle suit over Rosa Parks estateDetroit Free Press

all 15 news articles »


USA TODAY

New York Sues 3 Big Banks Over Mortgage Database
New York Times
Attorney General Eric T. Schneiderman of New York sued three major banks on Friday, accusing them of fraud in their use of an electronic mortgage database that he said resulted in deceptive and illegal practices, including false documents in ...
NY's Schneiderman sues banks in foreclosure effortWall Street Journal
New York sues banks over electronic mortgage systemReuters
Mortgage fraud unit co-chair sues biggest banksUSA TODAY

all 359 news articles »


Sloan-Kettering Chief Is Accused of Taking Research
New York Times
Yale, for example, won more than $1 million in compensation and legal fees in 2005 from a Nobel laureate it had accused of taking its technology. But the lawsuit against Dr. Thompson has particularly high stakes, potentially affecting the reputations ...

and more »


USA TODAY

Lawsuit: Gingrich security stomped on man's foot
USA TODAY
The lawsuit claims a "swarm" of security guards from Patriot Group International surrounded Dillard and one stomped on his foot while he was wearing open sandals, causing a fracture. Ron Paul's campaign called for Gingrich to apologize.
Newt Gingrich assault lawsuit: Orlando-area man says security broke his foot ...Baltimore Sun

all 150 news articles »


ABC News

Bob Bashara's Attorney Denies Murder-for-Hire Scheme
ABC News
The attorney for Bob Bashara, the husband of murdered Michigan mom Jane Bashara, said today he believes an ex-employee of Bob's murdered Jane out of anger and vengeance, and said he expected his client would not be charged. David Griem told reporters ...
Attorney says Mr Bashara passed private polygraph and Gentz is solely ...Daily Mail
Attorney Questions 'Police Source' Leaks In Bashara CaseHuffington Post
Bob Bashara: I had nothing to do with wife's deathDetroit Free Press

all 74 news articles »


Mirror.co.uk

End of Armstrong case raises questions
ESPN
By Bonnie D. Ford A 20-month-long federal criminal investigation of Lance Armstrong and his former professional cycling teams ended Friday with the unusual announcement by the Los Angeles-based United States Attorney's Office that the government was ...
Armstrong faces no charges as investigation is closedIrish Times
US Attorney Andre Birotte issues statement on Lance Armstrong doping investigationWashington Post
Lance Armstrong doping investigation dropped by US attorneyMirror.co.uk
Reuters -CNN
all 1,580 news articles »

Google News