SPONSOR ADS

  HOMEPAGE | ARTICLES

 

 

DIRECTORY CATEGORIES

Attorney Legal Services
Boston Legal
Boston Legal Abc
Continuing Legal Education
Debt Settlement Legal
Free Legal Aid
Free Legal Contract
Free Legal Document
Free Legal Form
Free Legal Form Download
Free Legal Form Online
Free Legal Wills
Free Online Legal Advice
Gay Marriage Legal
Home School Legal Defense

ARTICLES INDEX

1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6

 

SPONSOR ADS

SPONSOR ADS

Facts About FACTA, Or What Does FACTA Mean To You And Your Company

By Steve Mueller

Ever heard of FACTA? Most of us would say “No”. Have you heard that you can get a free credit report? To that we would say, “Yes”. So you have heard of FACTA. But how does that affect me?

FACTA stands for Fair and Accurate Credit Transaction Act. The law went into effect Jan. 1, 2005. FACTA is the law which allows all Americans access to their credit report once per year. So what does that have to do with you?

On June 1, 2005, a new provision of FACTA went into effect. It says that any employer (even if you only employ one person) whose action or inaction results in the loss of employee information, can be fined by federal and state government, and sued in civil court.
Bet you didn't know that. But you need to know, and need to know what you can do to protect yourself.

Small Businesses will be affected the most.

‘"A small businessman who makes a mistake could bear the brunt of a regulation like this," says James Plummer, policy analyst at Consumer Alert, a non-profit group that focuses on a free-market approach to consumer regulations.’

If you don't shred and information gets out, there are penalties. But what if you do shred all potential employee information, and take all necessary precautions to protect your past, current, and future employees’ identities, and the information still gets out somehow? Under FACTA, you could still be held responsible.

You may not think information theft could happen to you, but neither did a lot of companies, universities, government institutions, and businesses that have had employee or customer information stolen from them that have been in the news lately:

Lexis Nexis
University of Northern Colorado
California State University (Chico)
University of California – Berkeley
University of Maryland
Las Vegas Department of Motor Vehicles
Bank of America
Choice Point
Weld County (CO) Employees (information stolen by an inmate while in jail)

How can you, as an employer, minimize your liability?

There are hundreds of things you can do to minimize liability, which are probably things you already do. Document shredding, careful screening of employees who will be coming into contact with personal information of customers and employees, physically locking file drawers with sensitive information, and setting up firewalls on computer equipment connected to the Internet, among hundreds of other solutions, are all good ideas.

As Ben Franklin said, “An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure”, is definitely the case when it comes to securing personal information. However, no matter what prevention steps you take, there is no 100ffective way to be sure that employee’s information won’t be compromised. Even if the information doesn’t get out from your company, an employee can claim that it did.

That's a scary thought! What if an employee claims that their information was stolen through the actions of your company, but there’s no real proof to back it up? You will end up hiring (or using) an attorney to represent and defend you and your company in court. At $200 - $400/hour for most attorneys across the United States, how long can you afford to defend your company?

So what can you do?

One solution that would at least provide an affirmative defense against the fines, fees, and lawsuits you could incur as an employer, is to offer some sort of Identity Theft protection as a benefit to your employees.

As an employer, you can choose whether or not to pay for this added benefit. However, the most important thing you can do is to make the protection available, and have an employee meeting, to help employees understand Identity Theft and the protection that you are making available to them. When you make the protection available, and when your employees have been educated on the dangers of Identity Theft, they can either elect to have identity theft coverage as a benefit, or they can decline the coverage as a benefit.

If the employee has Identity Theft coverage and becomes a victim, it is beneficial to your business, because an employee with Identity Theft coverage will be notified immediately of the theft, spend less time, less money, and will experience less frustration while trying to have their information restored. This will get them back on the job and focused on work more quickly.

If the employee declines the coverage, and later claims that the information was stolen as a result of you or your company’s actions, you have a piece of paper, with their signature, saying that they attended the presentation and declined the coverage.

Choosing to not make Identity Theft coverage available leaves you exposed to an unlimited dollar amount that you can be sued for under civil liability, federal fines of up to $2,500.00 per employee per incident, and state fines of up to $1,000.00 per employee per incident.

Recommended course of action? Have a benefits consultant who offers an Identity Theft protection plan present to your employees. Help them set up a 20 minute presentation with your employees, and make it mandatory that all employees attend. You want your employees to be protected from this awful crime. If they choose not to be, but you’ve given the option of being protected, then the liability becomes theirs, not yours, when they become a victim of identity theft.

About the author:

Steve Mueller has over 25 years of human resource experience. He has worked in various fields of human resources; as a Trainer for Cooper Industries, Compensation and Management Development Manager for Zenith Electronics, Plant Personnel Manager for a motor manufacturing company and Benefits Manager for a multi-location distribution company. Steve holds a bachelors of science degree in education from Pittsburg State University. He has taught numerous adult education classes and seminars in the community. Steve has received community service awards for his participation in elementary school child safety programs.


Circulated by Article Emporium




 




  Copyright Horizonweb.com 2005-2006. All Rights Reserved.

Legal OR Lawyer OR Justice OR Attorney OR Lawsuit - Google News

By Revealing Man's Past, Lawyer Tests Court Secrecy
New York Times
In May 2010, a civil racketeering lawsuit was filed accusing a group of people associated with a New York investment firm of stealing millions of dollars from investors. The allegation was almost commonplace; the response was anything but.

and more »


Comics: Justice League fights real-world hunger
The Seattle Times
Batman, Superman, Wonder Woman and the rest of the Justice League will be used to raise awareness, not to mention millions of dollars. Both of which are needful. According to DC, the Horn countries are suffering their worst drought in more than 60 ...

and more »


USA TODAY

Judge allows 'Sister Wives' suit to proceed
The Associated Press
SALT LAKE CITY (AP) — A federal judge has ruled there's sufficient evidence to allow a polygamous family made famous by a reality TV show to pursue a lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of Utah's bigamy law. US District Judge Clark Waddoups on ...
Federal judge allows polygamous family's lawsuit challenging Utah's bigamy law ...Washington Post
Judge won't dismiss 'Sister Wives' lawsuitSalt Lake Tribune

all 183 news articles »


Teacher arrests show 'complete failure' at LA school, attorney says
Los Angeles Times
Accusations by a student at Miramonte Elementary School that she was a victim of two teachers accused of abuse raises troubling questions about oversight at the school, the attorney for her family said. “Based on my experience, it appears to show a ...

and more »


Newsday

Foreclosure Deal Deadline Arrives as States Consider Releases
BusinessWeek
6 (Bloomberg) -- States that balked at bank liability releases in a proposed $25 billion nationwide settlement over foreclosure practices must decide by today whether its mortgage relief and reforms are worth the legal claims they'll give up.
A Healthy SkepticismHuffington Post (blog)
NY Attorney General Slaps Fresh Mortgage Lawsuits On BofA, JPMorgan, Wells FargoForbes
Foreclosure Deal Gets CloserWall Street Journal
Washington Post -Houston Chronicle
all 35 news articles »


USA TODAY

Rosa Parks estate legal agreement revealed
USA TODAY
By Melanie Eversley, USA TODAY A secret legal agreement to settle the squabbles over the estate of civil rights grand dame Rosa Parks has been made public by the Detroit Free Press. The news organization reports that the seven-page confidential ...
The secrets are out on deal to settle suit over Rosa Parks estateDetroit Free Press

all 15 news articles »


USA TODAY

New York Sues 3 Big Banks Over Mortgage Database
New York Times
Attorney General Eric T. Schneiderman of New York sued three major banks on Friday, accusing them of fraud in their use of an electronic mortgage database that he said resulted in deceptive and illegal practices, including false documents in ...
NY's Schneiderman sues banks in foreclosure effortWall Street Journal
New York sues banks over electronic mortgage systemReuters
Mortgage fraud unit co-chair sues biggest banksUSA TODAY

all 359 news articles »


Sloan-Kettering Chief Is Accused of Taking Research
New York Times
Yale, for example, won more than $1 million in compensation and legal fees in 2005 from a Nobel laureate it had accused of taking its technology. But the lawsuit against Dr. Thompson has particularly high stakes, potentially affecting the reputations ...

and more »


Mirror.co.uk

Armstrong probe could affect future federal cases
USA TODAY
LOS ANGELES (AP) – Now that the federal government has closed its investigation of Lance Armstrong, some legal experts are wondering whether the effort to prosecute superstar athletes over doping claims is worth it. By Franck Prevel, AP After a ...
Armstrong faces no charges as investigation is closedIrish Times
US Attorney Andre Birotte issues statement on Lance Armstrong doping investigationWashington Post
Lance Armstrong doping investigation dropped by US attorneyMirror.co.uk
ESPN -Reuters
all 1,582 news articles »


USA TODAY

Lawsuit: Gingrich security stomped on man's foot
USA TODAY
The lawsuit claims a "swarm" of security guards from Patriot Group International surrounded Dillard and one stomped on his foot while he was wearing open sandals, causing a fracture. Ron Paul's campaign called for Gingrich to apologize.
Newt Gingrich assault lawsuit: Orlando-area man says security broke his foot ...Baltimore Sun

all 150 news articles »

Google News